AI without an owner
Staff use AI tools without rules, with sensitive information and no traceability.
An external Chief AI Officer with a clear mandate, a defined monthly capacity and accountability to leadership. We bring order to how your organization adopts artificial intelligence: what to do first, how to do it safely and how to prove it pays off.
Executive outcomeIt is the Chief AI Officer function engaged with flexible dedication. A senior leader takes ownership of the artificial intelligence program — strategy, governance and delivery — under a mandate agreed with senior management, a fixed monthly time budget and a clear reporting line.
In many mid-sized companies nobody owns AI: each department tries tools on its own and no one is accountable for the outcome. AI is already in your company, even if no one approved it. The question is not whether to adopt it, but whether anyone is leading it.
Staff use AI tools without rules, with sensitive information and no traceability.
Enthusiastic trials that never reach production or measurable value.
Information leakage, intellectual property exposure and vendor lock-in.
Customers, auditors and regulators are starting to ask how AI is governed.
Hiring a full-time CAIO is costly and difficult in the region.
The board needs to know what is invested, what is gained and what risk is taken.
The CAIO does not hand over a report and leave: these functions are carried out continuously and answered for before leadership.
An iterative cycle: every phase produces concrete deliverables and clear decisions.
Data and process maturity, current AI use (including unapproved), objectives and constraints.
→ AI maturity assessment
A portfolio of use cases scored by value, feasibility, risk and data availability.
→ Use-case map and roadmap
Acceptable use policy, roles, AI committee, risk, privacy and security controls.
→ AI governance framework
Bounded pilots with success metrics, evaluated vendors and exit criteria.
→ Measured pilots and scale decision
Operational adoption, training, change management and indicator tracking.
→ Value dashboard and continuous improvement
The service runs on a fixed monthly capacity, expressed in days of dedication agreed in the proposal, with scheduled sessions (on site or remote) and availability between sessions for time-sensitive decisions.
For organizations planning to hire their own head of AI. The CAIO builds the function — strategy, governance, team and first initiatives — and hands it over in an orderly way when the internal hire arrives.
Illustrative: shows the shape of the engagement, not figures from a real case.
A permanent part-time role embedded in the leadership team. The right fit when the organization needs senior AI leadership on a sustained basis but cannot yet justify a full-time position.
Illustrative: shows the shape of the engagement, not figures from a real case.
Ownership of a defined transformation initiative — for example, bringing AI into customer service or an operational process — with agreed scope, timeline and deliverables.
Illustrative: shows the shape of the engagement, not figures from a real case.
Consulting delivers recommendations. CAIO as a Service takes responsibility for getting them done.
Authority and reporting line defined in writing and agreed with senior management and any internal bodies that need to be involved.
Progress is measured against each use case's KPIs and business case, not hours or activity.
Structures, documentation and policies stay with the company. If an internal role is created, the handover is planned from the start.
| Aspect | Traditional consulting | CAIO as a Service |
|---|---|---|
| Role | Advises and recommends | Leads and is accountable for the outcome |
| Horizon | A project with an end date | Ongoing, interim or project-based function, with handover |
| Measurement | Deliverables and hours | Business KPIs per use case |
| Vendors | May be tied to one technology | Independent evaluation based on your needs |
| Knowledge | Stays in the report | Stays in your policies, processes and people |
| Cost | Varies project by project | Fixed, predictable monthly capacity |
Before entering the working cycle, we agree on the mandate and the baseline.
Objectives, scope, reporting line and monthly capacity are agreed with leadership.
→ Agreed mandate
Review of current AI use, use-case discovery and a readiness assessment across data, processes and people.
→ AI baseline
The AI strategy, roadmap and policy are defined and approved.
→ Approved strategy and policy
Delivery leadership, reviews, reporting to leadership and, where applicable, handover to an internal leader.
→ Regular reporting and handover
Our leadership's 30+ years in IT governance, technology risk and cybersecurity, applied to AI adoption.
Models and tools are compared against explicit criteria, based on your needs rather than a brand.
One person answers to leadership for the AI program.
A fixed monthly capacity, with no open-ended hours or invoice surprises.
Senior leadership today, without creating a full-time position yet.
If you later hire an internal CAIO, they inherit a function that is already organized.
When cybersecurity leadership and AI leadership work together, innovation moves forward without opening gaps. LandoHOUSE can combine both services under a single governance model.
Leads the organization's artificial intelligence strategy: prioritizes initiatives, sets governance and controls, coordinates departments and vendors, and measures the value obtained.
A vendor sells or implements a tool; a consultant solves a project. CAIO as a Service leads the entire program, under an agreed mandate, independent from vendors and accountable to leadership.
Three: interim (builds the function and hands it over to an internal leader), ongoing (a permanent part-time role) and project-based (ownership of a defined transformation). All three run on a fixed monthly capacity.
No. The CAIO leads, prioritizes and oversees. Building is done by your teams, specialized partners or external vendors under the CAIO's coordination.
It is planned from the start: policies, documentation, indicators and decisions stay with the company, and the handover is supported so the function does not start from zero.
Not necessarily. If your teams already use AI or you plan to invest in it, on-demand leadership prevents scattered risk and spending with proportional dedication.
Mainly ISO/IEC 42001 (AI management systems) and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, complemented by ISO/IEC 27001 for information security, the EU AI Act where the organization does business in Europe, and applicable legal requirements.
The first deliverables (assessment, use policy and prioritized cases) arrive in the early stages; pilot value depends on each case and is measured with agreed indicators.
Through confidentiality agreements, least-privilege access and the rule of not entering sensitive information into unapproved tools. AI vendor assessment is part of the service.
It depends on the monthly capacity, maturity and scope. Because the capacity is fixed, the cost is predictable. We quote after a free diagnostic conversation.
Tell us what you want to achieve with AI, what you already use and what concerns you. We will reply with a proposal for first steps.